Goodbye Iraq: Last US combat brigade heads home
#1
Posted 18 August 2010 - 07:30 PM
For these troops of the 4th Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, it was a moment of relief fraught with symbolism. Seven years and five months after the U.S.-led invasion, the last American combat brigade was leaving Iraq, well ahead of President Barack Obama's Aug. 31 deadline for ending U.S. combat operations there.
___
EDITOR'S NOTE: The 4th Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division was officially designated the last combat brigade to leave Iraq under Obama's plan to end combat operations in Iraq by Aug. 31. Associated Press writer Rebecca Santana joined the troops on their final journey out of the country.
___
When 18-year-old Spc. Luke Dill first rolled into Iraq as part of the U.S. invasion, his Humvee was so vulnerable to bombs that the troops lined its floor with flak jackets.
Now 25 and a staff sergeant after two tours of duty, he rode out of Iraq this week in a Stryker, an eight-wheeled behemoth encrusted with armor and add-ons to ward off grenades and other projectiles.
http://news.yahoo.co...icans_head_home
#6
Posted 19 August 2010 - 09:28 AM
Or found the phantom weapons of mass destruction...lets call it what it is, we basically went in and invaded a country, turned the fucker upside down and left in the name of a pretty much completely unrelated terrorist attack.
Well we did help rewrite their Constitution while we were at it, in that we included production sharing agreements which essentially give exploration rights to foreign companies. The oil already in use remains under the ownership of the Iraqi people. This leaves about 2/3 of Iraqi reserves open for exploration by foreign companies.
Also, we brought purple fingers to the Middle East.
#7
Posted 19 August 2010 - 09:38 AM
#8
Posted 19 August 2010 - 09:37 PM
Maybe basic running water and electricity will be restored while leaving.
They have that. Iraq is in better shape in terms of infrastructure than before the war. All the conflict presently in Iraq isn't being caused by America. It's caused by Iraqi and other Arabs bombing innocent civilians left and right. Americans habitually refuse to look at the middle east through a realistic lense. The culture and beliefs of the middle east are vastly different than they are in the west. Over there it's all about what you can do for me and my kin and what can I get to have leverage over you. Their armed forces can't even supply each other with basic logisitics without some kind of barter and trade system. It is fear and force that kept these people in line. That is why the middle eastern countries able to embrace an implement western ideals are convsersely those least like your typical Arab. Iraq can't fix itself because it doesn't want to be fixed.
#9
Posted 19 August 2010 - 09:42 PM
Maybe basic running water and electricity will be restored while leaving.
They have that. Iraq is in better shape in terms of infrastructure than before the war. All the conflict presently in Iraq isn't being caused by America. It's caused by Iraqi and other Arabs bombing innocent civilians left and right. Americans habitually refuse to look at the middle east through a realistic lense. The culture and beliefs of the middle east are vastly different than they are in the west. Over there it's all about what you can do for me and my kin and what can I get to have leverage over you. Their armed forces can't even supply each other with basic logisitics without some kind of barter and trade system. It is fear and force that kept these people in line. That is why the middle eastern countries able to embrace an implement western ideals are convsersely those least like your typical Arab. Iraq can't fix itself because it doesn't want to be fixed.
Among the many reasons why assuming that democracy is "the best" or that it will easily work everywhere is an erroneous assumption. I admit to very incomplete knowledge of Arab culture, but I do know that democracy is RARELY "imposed" with success. To do so, you almost have to completely crush a people (i.e. Germany, Japan...as opposed to Iraq or Afghanistan)
#10
Posted 20 August 2010 - 12:08 AM
Maybe basic running water and electricity will be restored while leaving.
They have that. Iraq is in better shape in terms of infrastructure than before the war
Instead of upgrading, let's just bomb the fuck out of everything and take years while spending millions/billions to rebuild it all again.
#11
Posted 20 August 2010 - 12:13 AM
Maybe basic running water and electricity will be restored while leaving.
They have that. Iraq is in better shape in terms of infrastructure than before the war. All the conflict presently in Iraq isn't being caused by America. It's caused by Iraqi and other Arabs bombing innocent civilians left and right. Americans habitually refuse to look at the middle east through a realistic lense. The culture and beliefs of the middle east are vastly different than they are in the west. Over there it's all about what you can do for me and my kin and what can I get to have leverage over you. Their armed forces can't even supply each other with basic logisitics without some kind of barter and trade system. It is fear and force that kept these people in line. That is why the middle eastern countries able to embrace an implement western ideals are convsersely those least like your typical Arab. Iraq can't fix itself because it doesn't want to be fixed.
I do know that democracy is RARELY "imposed" with success.
In addition, Guerrilla warfare like in Afghanistan or Iraq is virtually unstoppable, while ironically Gandhi pretty much brought down the entire British Empire without firing a single shot.
#12
Posted 20 August 2010 - 05:58 PM
They have that. Iraq is in better shape in terms of infrastructure than before the war. All the conflict presently in Iraq isn't being caused by America. It's caused by Iraqi and other Arabs bombing innocent civilians left and right. Americans habitually refuse to look at the middle east through a realistic lense. The culture and beliefs of the middle east are vastly different than they are in the west. Over there it's all about what you can do for me and my kin and what can I get to have leverage over you. Their armed forces can't even supply each other with basic logisitics without some kind of barter and trade system. It is fear and force that kept these people in line. That is why the middle eastern countries able to embrace an implement western ideals are convsersely those least like your typical Arab. Iraq can't fix itself because it doesn't want to be fixed.
I do know that democracy is RARELY "imposed" with success.
In addition, Guerrilla warfare like in Afghanistan or Iraq is virtually unstoppable, while ironically Gandhi pretty much brought down the entire British Empire without firing a single shot.
I respectfully disagree. India was let go because the British were dismantling their empire after ww2. They no longer had the will or the funds to sustain a global empire. How many other colonies were released at the same time with no Ghandis on hunger strike?
#13
Posted 21 August 2010 - 04:45 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users