So I've seen the common core criteria issue in the news a lot lately. I guess the GOP governor of Indiana was the first to block its implementation. I'll admit that I'm not very well read on the issue, but what is the opposition to it? It seems having a unified criteria that all schools must touch seems like a great idea. It will help assure that every student is presented with the material necessary to be well-rounded and competitive when they move on to college, trade-school or right into the work force.
So long as the agenda isn't hi-jacked to include politically correct nonsense (like an even amount of time to "insert race/culture" history to topics like American history or world history) I don't see how it's an issue and why someone should oppose it. Again, this isn't an issue I'm well versed on (hence why I bring it up here) but so long as states and localities have some autonomy on how they present the material with space left available for subjects important to that district, this seems like a great idea to me. It would do much to start holding teachers and students accountable and remove the plethora of excuses as to why some areas perform poorly compared to their peers.