I don't get it. I read it twice, but I don't get it. Apparently Walker's doing something different, but I'll be damned if the article actually says what it is instead of speaking in a mix of vague platitudes and anti-left insults.
Also, why is she so proud that he doesn't have a college degree? There's a twisted logic to being anti-intellectual to the point that you frown on what for many people is a success. Oddly enough, given Walker's efforts to gut the University of Wisconsin system, education will only become more expensive and, thus, elitist. Additionally, tearing down something you didn't participate in strikes me as a very elitist attitude. How can he know what's good or bad about it if he didn't go? Because he's so elite that he knows better than everyone else! So, the pro-elitist (in terms of wealth) party and anti-elitist (in terms of education) party manage to be the same thing and, by doing something they see as anti-elitist (reducing government to give it back to "common folks"), even if it's done in an elitist "we know better" way, they'll actually be creating an even more elitist institution. However, if those common folks band together as a union, they stop being individuals and start being elites, so they need to be crushed. So, yeah, that makes sense. Just have to rename Walker's party to the GOC (that's the Grand Old Clusterfuck for you acronymically challenged non-elites).
Sister burn the temple
And stand beneath the moon
The sound of the ocean is dead
It's just the echo of the blood in your head
