171 replies to this topic

[Mr. Roboto]

I also read today that his supporters took down a Mastercard website, and it hasn't been able to get it back online yet.

[TAP]

He has been arrested now and is being held without bail. Here's basically the same story with a few more details - see especially the last 6 paragraphs.
http://www.dailymail...dwide-hunt.html
Sounds like 4chan/anonymous have taken down visa.com now too. It's a really fascinating battle in my opinion - will the internet end up being method of controlling information for authoritarian governments, or the hardest place to control information flow?

[Mr. Roboto]

Wow, Visa too? This is getting very interesting, I'm curious to see what happens next.

Damn....

[TAP]

http://www.amconmag....-for-wikileaks/

[TAP]

http://www.guardian....bel-peace-prize

[Mr. Roboto]

And he's back out on the street and feeling more leaky than ever...

[Timothy]

I wonder if he will try and find The Leaky Cauldron?!

[TAP]

I think we should all make a Xmas donation to wikileaks in Randall's name. Though apparently Glenn Beck supports wikileaks now, which I find a little disconcerting

[freedom78]

Though apparently Glenn Beck supports wikileaks now, which I find a little disconcerting

I'm sure that has more to do with the "(D)" after the President's name than anything. Were this the Bush admin...well, no explanation needed.

[Mr. Roboto]

Does this make Michael Moore and Glenn Beck pals?

Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange
By Michael Moore

Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.

Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.

We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again.

So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top:

**Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act."

**The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."

**Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders."

**Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch."

**Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist."

**Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization."

And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us!

WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this. But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases everything without any editorial control!"). WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as secrets.

I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo. That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.

But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?

But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented.)

Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?

Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.

Instead, secrets killed them.

For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the "official story." And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his release today.

Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed.

And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism. Period.

I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice to continue unchallenged.

P.S. You can read the statement I filed today in the London court here.

P.P.S. If you're reading this in London, please go support Julian Assange and WikiLeaks at a demonstration at 1 PM today, Tuesday the 14th, in front of the Westminster court.

[freedom78]

Definition of irony?

When the confidential case file regarding an infamous internet illuminator's alleged sexual assault is leaked on said internet.

http://www.msnbc.msn...ks_in_security/

[TAP]

Those details don't seem much different to the stories from last week posted in this thread.

[cousin it]

A Message from Anonymous - 01/29/2011Hello, world.

You are now breathing manually.

Overthe last few weeks, North Africans have expressed an ardent desire forliberty, democracy, and justice for both themselves, and for the world.While most in the West responded with a mild interest and cynicism forwhich our culture has become rightly reviled, Anonymous responded withaction. Beginning with Tunisia and continuing on to Egypt, thousands ofworld citizens have dedicated their lives to securing the liberty ofothers, providing tools, expertise, and long-sought encouragement tothose who have already earned their rights by virtue of fighting forthem.

When Tunisians bristled in indignation at the chains thathave bound them for far too long, the world was silent. Anonymous wasnot; and thus the online venues of state propaganda were taken down andin some cases replaced with our own clear message that those who wantour help will get it.

When protests erupted upon the occasion ofone fruit vendor's bravery, the media ignored it. Anonymous did not,and thus Tunisians were provided with the Guide to Protecting the NorthAfrican Revolutions.

When Wikileaks confirmed the cruelty andcorruption of the Ben Ali regime, Western governments did nothing.Anonymous organized hundreds of Tunisians directly and thousands moreindirectly.

It was the Tunisian people themselves that overcamethe tyranny to which they had been subjected. They did so in thecontext of the digital reformation, with unprecedented assistanceprovided over a mere few weeks. Others will follow. Some have alreadybegun.

...

That the Egyptian regime has reacted to theyearning of its citizens by shutting down the nation's communicationsis the smoking gun that should tell the world that communications arethe key to liberty. That we live in the communications age should, andhas been, of great alarm to all who love their power more than theirpeople, or who consider themselves to be the only ones capable ofgoverning the world around them. That they have failed to provide anyreal security should remind all concerned that such people are not onlyunnecessary to true security, but a perpetual threat to same.

Anonymousis a machine that harnesses the talent that other, lesser institutionsoften fail to acknowledge or incorporate. Man is a creature that buildsinstitutions and thereafter loses his grip on them. Anonymous curesinstitutions that are dying and destroys institutions that ought tohave died long ago.

All significant human activity is the resultof human collaboration - including this very press release. And themeans by which humans may collaborate has exploded - not expanded, notincreased, but exploded - in such a way as to allow any man on earth totalk and work with any other man.

Such issues will be exploredsoon enough. In the meantime, we demand that all normal communicationsbe restored to the people of Egypt by January 29th, 12:00 midnight,Eastern Standard Time. That we have occasion to make such a demand inthe first place should be enough to convince all good men that theworld needs revolution. That we have made it in full view of all menshould be enough to convince them that we now have the means to back itup - not just against this regime, but against any and all parties thatcontinue to prop it up even after it has conceded that the truth is itsenemy.

We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not Forgive.
We do not Forget.

[Mr. Roboto]

Anybody see the interview on 60 mins this Sunday?

[Timothy]

got it dvr'd but haven't watched yet.